Blog

Dialogue or Monologue? The Question of the Presidential Debate

 
Picture of Emily Young
Dialogue or Monologue? The Question of the Presidential Debate
by Emily Young - 2 October 2016
 

Photocredit: CBS News

Although for the past two weeks, my German Media class has discussed Oktoberfest and the War in  Syria, the theme selected this past week was the  Presidential Debate. Not only does it play a large  role in shaping how voters view the presidential candidates; the debate is also one of the primary examples of how the media affects results of the election. The first in a series of three, this debate has racked up the largest number of TV viewers in the history of U.S. elections.  The topics of the debate included “America’s Direction”, “Achieving Prosperity”, and “Securing America”. The issues addressed included those relevant to jobs in America, minimum wage, taxation, trade and racism.

Ann-Arbor_Emily.pngThe responses leading up to and following the debate could be heard across dorm rooms, classrooms and sport venues. Yet, despite the performance and responses of the two nominees, the overwhelming majority of students don't feel more inclined towards one candidate or the other.  Students feel that instead of providing the clarification and addressing what is important for voting in this upcoming election (many for the first time), the debate has ignited more controversy than coherence on campus. Combining the three questions of competence (die Kompetenzfrage), trust (die Vertrauensfrage), and popularity (die Sympathiefrage) many watchers of the debate could not elicit a clear winner.

German-turkish author Selim Özdogen, currently residing in Ann Arbor, shared his input on the debate with German classes at U of M. Selim declared  “das ist keine Demokratie” (It is not a democracy), when a debate does not answer the question of the people, and instead becomes a platform to advance one’s own ideals. Dylan Gooch, a neuroscience major here at the U of M, stated this same problem to be true. Gooch shared that for him “there are so many dissenting opinions on U.S. issues, such as whether NAFTA was or was not a good U.S. policy, making it difficult for young adults to make decisions”.  

College Republican’s president Enrique Zalamea described how an event screening the debate to all students interested, was disrupted by protesters: “We were met with protesters who disrupted our peaceful non-partisan event with hateful comments. Everyone is entitled to their own political opinions, but it’s disappointing to see such animosity from a liberal population that ironically advocates acceptance, tolerance, and personal freedoms”.

What will happen during the next debate is controversial, but what can be predicted is that students will prioritize watching it in the hopes of becoming informed on the possible directions for America’s future.

If you missed the debate you can find a link below and other interesting articles addressing the issues and content of the debate

For articles addressing the debate and what was discussed:

Links to the Debate and other Helpful Debate Videos:

German Responses to the Debate:

 


Emily Young is a student in International Studies at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. She grew up in the tri-border region of Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium and has a serious interest in US and EU Relations. Emily loves photography and will contribute a photo series.
#Election2016